Documents & Evidence

Complete correspondence and supporting materials

📚 Academic Research

The original research study that the FJC cited and misrepresented:

"Alienating behaviours in separated mothers and fathers in the UK"

Authors: Hine, B., Harman, J., Leder-Elder, S., and Bates, E.A.
Publisher: The University of West London (2024)

📨 Correspondence with FJC

The complete record of correspondence between concerned parents and the Family Justice Council:

Original Joint Letter

29 January 2025 • 84 signatories

INITIAL COMPLAINT

Joint letter from 84 parents raising concerns about research misrepresentation in the FJC guidance on alienating behaviours.

📄 View Document →

FJC Initial Response

20 March 2025

FJC RESPONSE

The Family Justice Council's first response defending their interpretation of the research findings.

📄 View Document →

Detailed Rebuttal

7 April 2025

DETAILED ANALYSIS

Comprehensive point-by-point response showing fundamental misinterpretation of methodology, including statement from Professor Hine.

📄 View Document →

FJC Final Response

11 September 2025

DISMISSIVE

The FJC's disappointing final response claiming prevalence "is not the focus" and avoiding core issues.

📄 View Document →

🔍 Supporting Evidence

Additional materials that support the case for research misrepresentation:

Professor Ben Hine's Statement

Direct statement from the lead researcher contradicting the FJC's interpretation of his own study findings.

📄 View Statement →

Real-World Impact Documentation

Evidence of how the misrepresentation affects training and early intervention in local authorities.

📄 View Evidence →

Methodological Analysis

Detailed explanation of the difference between frequency ratings and prevalence assessment.

📄 View Analysis →

📦 Complete Document Package

Download all correspondence and supporting materials in one convenient package.

⬇️ Download Complete Archive

Includes all letters, responses, research papers, and supporting evidence

📋 Usage Notice

These documents are provided for transparency and public accountability purposes. Please respect privacy and use responsibly. Direct quotes should be attributed appropriately.